CBL International vs Martin Midstream Partners L.P.
BANL and MMLP side by side, both in wholesale trade-non-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BANL and MMLP compare
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.2% versus −9.1% for CBL International).
CBL International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.56% compared with −1.4% at Martin Midstream Partners L.P..
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. pays a dividend yielding 0.89%; CBL International does not pay one.
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for CBL International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BANL | MMLP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $87.6M |
| Share price | $3.11 | $2.24 |
| Change, 1 year | −49.0% | −13.8% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −21.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.21 | 0.44 |
| Employees | – | 1,723 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 0.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 5.6× |
| FCF yield | – | −21.3% |
| Fair value | – | $17.42 |
| Margin of safety | – | 87.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −9.1% | 13.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 1.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 0.83% | 50.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | −0.45% | 6.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.56% (better) | −1.4% |
| FCF margin | 0.74% (better) | −2.3% |
| Return on equity | −13.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −14.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.69 |
| Interest coverage | −3.3× | 0.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.25 | 1.35 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.91 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.89% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.89% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.06% | 44.3% |
| Held by insiders | 9.7% | 66.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $75.5K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.01% | 0.62% |
Go deeper
- BANL stock overview
- BANL income statement
- BANL valuation and score
- MMLP stock overview
- MMLP income statement
- MMLP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.