Booz Allen Hamilton vs V2X
BAH and VVX side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BAH and VVX compare
Booz Allen Hamilton is the larger company, worth 4.2 times as much as V2X ($10.6B against $2.5B).
On earnings, Booz Allen Hamilton is cheaper: it trades at 13.9× trailing earnings, against 27.7× for V2X.
V2X grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.0% versus −7.3% for Booz Allen Hamilton).
Booz Allen Hamilton keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with 1.9% at V2X.
Booz Allen Hamilton pays a dividend yielding 2.6%; V2X does not pay one.
Booz Allen Hamilton scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 10 for V2X), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BAH | VVX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.6B | $2.5B |
| Share price | $88.49 | $80.37 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.8% | 40.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 1.9% | 53.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 0.86 |
| Employees | 32K | 16K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.9× (better) | 27.7× |
| P/S | 1.0× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 8.9× | 2.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.5× (better) | 16.4× |
| P/FCF | 9.5× (better) | 19.3× |
| PEG | 0.28 | – |
| FCF yield | 10.5% (better) | 5.2% |
| Fair value | $127.13 | $71.23 |
| Margin of safety | 30.4% (better) | −12.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.3% | 13.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.4% | 26.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −25.3% | 30.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −21.7% | 31.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 9.6% (better) | −4.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.0% (better) | 8.5% |
| Operating margin | 9.5% (better) | 4.2% |
| Net margin | 7.0% (better) | 1.9% |
| FCF margin | 10.1% (better) | 2.7% |
| Return on equity | 68.6% (better) | 8.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 20.5% (better) | 8.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.27 | 0.94 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.78 (better) | 4.15 |
| Current ratio | 1.59 (better) | 1.32 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.78 (better) | 2.75 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.6% | – |
| Payout ratio | 35.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 4.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.8% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.3% | 99.8% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 60.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$64.1K (better) | −$488M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.8% | 19.4% |
Go deeper
- BAH stock overview
- BAH income statement
- BAH valuation and score
- VVX stock overview
- VVX income statement
- VVX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.