Azul vs LATAM Airlines
AZUL and LTM side by side, both in air transportation, scheduled, and air courier. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AZUL and LTM compare
LATAM Airlines grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.2% versus 10.8% for Azul).
LATAM Airlines scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Azul), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AZUL | LTM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $4.00 | $42.38 |
| Change, 1 year | 70.2% | −5.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 0.91 |
| Employees | – | 41K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.8% | 11.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 30.4% (better) | 29.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 49.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 53.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 29.2% |
| Operating margin | 20.0% (better) | 16.4% |
| Net margin | – | 10.2% |
| FCF margin | −6.6% | 13.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 141% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.01 | – |
| Interest coverage | 0.4× | 3.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.21 | 0.60 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 41.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Held by insiders | 8.7% | 14.1% |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
Go deeper
- AZUL stock overview
- AZUL income statement
- AZUL valuation and score
- LTM stock overview
- LTM income statement
- LTM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.