Azenta vs Cricut
AZTA and CRCT side by side, both in special industry machinery, except metalworking. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AZTA and CRCT compare
Azenta and Cricut are about the same size, with market caps of $2.0B and $1.8B.
Azenta grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.9% versus −0.91% for Cricut).
Cricut keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.4% compared with −20.0% at Azenta.
Cricut pays a dividend yielding 2.3%; Azenta does not pay one.
Cricut scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 8 for Azenta), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AZTA | CRCT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.0B | $1.8B |
| Share price | $45.65 | $8.65 |
| Change, 1 year | 48.4% | 82.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −61.8% | −65.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.33 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 3,000 | 700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.2× |
| P/S | 3.3× | 2.6× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 4.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.8× |
| P/FCF | 202× | – |
| PEG | – | 2.49 |
| FCF yield | 0.49% | – |
| Fair value | $55.23 | $11.12 |
| Margin of safety | 17.3% | 22.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.9% (better) | −0.91% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | −5.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 17.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 18.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −13.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 44.0% | 58.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −28.6% | 16.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −20.0% | 13.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.6% | – |
| Return on equity | −7.7% | 25.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −13.2% | 63.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | 254× |
| Current ratio | 2.50 (better) | 2.40 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.49 | 6.78 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 44.3% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 115% | 14.3% |
| Held by insiders | 12.6% | 75.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $172K (better) | −$9.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.1% | 9.6% |
Go deeper
- AZTA stock overview
- AZTA income statement
- AZTA valuation and score
- CRCT stock overview
- CRCT income statement
- CRCT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.