StockData

A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions vs Nauticus Robotics

AZ and KITT side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AZ and KITT compare

A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (153% versus 32.4% for Nauticus Robotics).

A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −236% compared with −1132% at Nauticus Robotics.

Nauticus Robotics scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAZKITT
Size and price
Market cap–$9.0M
Share price$5.44$1.21
Change, 1 year−1.3%−98.3%
Change, 5 years−72.5%−100.0%
Beta (5Y)1.070.59
Employees12251
StockData Score
Total score47 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score11
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–2.2×
P/B–1.7×
Fair value–$5.08
Margin of safety–76.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)153% (better)32.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average49.2%–
Profitability
Gross margin20.1% (better)−205%
Operating margin−268% (better)−568%
Net margin−236% (better)−1132%
FCF margin−248%–
Return on equity−69.8%–
Return on invested capital−108% (better)−142%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.03 (better)0.06
Interest coverage–−2.8×
Current ratio7.52 (better)0.13
Altman Z-score–−16.14
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−183%
Shareholder yield–−183%
Ownership
Held by institutions44.4%8.6%
Held by insiders2.5%–
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$4.4M
Short interest, % of float12.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.