Axon Enterprise vs Sturm Ruger
AXON and RGR side by side, both in fabricated metal products, except machinery and transportation equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AXON and RGR compare
Axon Enterprise is the larger company, worth 49 times as much as Sturm Ruger ($34.8B against $706M).
On earnings, Sturm Ruger is cheaper: it trades at 58.9× trailing earnings, against 177× for Axon Enterprise.
Axon Enterprise grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (34.6% versus 7.6% for Sturm Ruger).
Axon Enterprise keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.2% compared with 2.1% at Sturm Ruger.
Sturm Ruger pays a dividend yielding 1.00%; Axon Enterprise does not pay one.
Sturm Ruger scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 6 for Axon Enterprise), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AXON | RGR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $34.8B | $706M |
| Share price | $427.77 | $44.20 |
| Change, 1 year | −43.7% | 0.18% |
| Change, 5 years | 134% | −39.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.49 | 0.38 |
| Employees | 5,100 | 18 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 177× | 58.9× (better) |
| P/S | 10.8× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/B | 9.5× | 2.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 269× | 19.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 261× | 14.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.38% | 6.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $74.82 | $23.62 |
| Margin of safety | −472% | −87.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 34.6% (better) | 7.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 32.5% (better) | −0.82% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −38.9% | 111% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −40.3% | 142% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 59.4% (better) | 18.7% |
| Operating margin | 0.74% | 0.97% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.2% (better) | 2.1% |
| FCF margin | 4.1% | 8.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.2% (better) | 4.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 0.65% | 3.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.47 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.81 | – |
| Interest coverage | 0.2× | 55.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.15 | 3.35 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 6.39 | 9.51 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.00% |
| Payout ratio | – | 51.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −37.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.1% | 59.9% |
| Held by insiders | 5.4% | 12.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$130M | $224K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | 7.0% |
Go deeper
- AXON stock overview
- AXON income statement
- AXON valuation and score
- RGR stock overview
- RGR income statement
- RGR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.