Solowin vs Mmtec
AXG and MTC side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AXG and MTC compare
Solowin grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (895% versus −56.8% for Mmtec).
Solowin keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −47.4% compared with −6944% at Mmtec.
Solowin scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 1 for Mmtec), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AXG | MTC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.05 | $5.66 |
| Change, 1 year | −99.9% | 139% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −95.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.98 | 0.43 |
| Employees | 25 | 31 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 895% (better) | −56.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 1.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 21.6% |
| Operating margin | – | −471% |
| Net margin | −47.4% (better) | −6944% |
| FCF margin | −55.3% | – |
| Return on equity | −88.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −0.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.55 | 11.27 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.73% | – |
| Held by insiders | 66.0% | 0.05% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.05% | 0.59% |
Go deeper
- AXG stock overview
- AXG income statement
- AXG valuation and score
- MTC stock overview
- MTC income statement
- MTC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.