American Water Works vs Middlesex Water
AWK and MSEX side by side, both in water supply. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AWK and MSEX compare
American Water Works is the larger company, worth 27 times as much as Middlesex Water ($28.7B against $1.1B).
On earnings, Middlesex Water is cheaper: it trades at 20.5× trailing earnings, against 25.0× for American Water Works.
Middlesex Water grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.9% versus 6.8% for American Water Works).
Middlesex Water keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.5% compared with 21.4% at American Water Works.
Both pay dividends: American Water Works yields 2.4% and Middlesex Water 2.5%.
Middlesex Water scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 9 for American Water Works), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AWK | MSEX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $28.7B | $1.1B |
| Share price | $144.37 | $56.79 |
| Change, 1 year | 11.0% | −2.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −14.9% | −45.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 0.32 |
| Employees | 7,000 | 395 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.0× | 20.5× (better) |
| P/S | 5.4× | 5.0× (better) |
| P/B | 2.5× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.4× | 15.3× (better) |
| PEG | 3.11 | – |
| FCF yield | −3.6% | – |
| Fair value | $133.42 | $64.50 |
| Margin of safety | −8.2% | 12.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.8% | 8.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.5% | 6.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.2% | 20.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 4.0% | 15.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.8% (better) | 1.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 37.0% (better) | 30.5% |
| Net margin | 21.4% | 24.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −19.5% | – |
| Return on equity | 10.1% | 10.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.8% | 6.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.37 | 0.73 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.47 | 4.14 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.0× | 4.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.52 (better) | 0.51 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.08 | 1.18 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | 2.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 58.3% | 51.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.5% (better) | 5.8% |
| Buyback yield | – | −3.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.4% (better) | −1.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 83.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.15% | 1.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $16.3K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.9% | – |
Go deeper
- AWK stock overview
- AWK income statement
- AWK valuation and score
- MSEX stock overview
- MSEX income statement
- MSEX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.