Armstrong World Industries vs Latham
AWI and SWIM side by side, both in miscellaneous plastics products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AWI and SWIM compare
Armstrong World Industries is the larger company, worth 7.6 times as much as Latham ($7.4B against $972M).
On earnings, Armstrong World Industries is cheaper: it trades at 23.5× trailing earnings, against 103× for Latham.
Latham grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.9% versus 9.1% for Armstrong World Industries).
Armstrong World Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.4% compared with 1.6% at Latham.
Armstrong World Industries pays a dividend yielding 0.58%; Latham does not pay one.
Armstrong World Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 8 for Latham), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AWI | SWIM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.4B | $972M |
| Share price | $175.74 | $8.26 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.8% | 21.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 56.8% | −63.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 1.89 |
| Employees | 2,500 | 1,804 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.5× (better) | 103× |
| P/S | 4.2× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | 8.2× | 2.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.5× (better) | 13.8× |
| P/FCF | 33.7× | 20.9× (better) |
| PEG | 1.34 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.0% | 4.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $188.16 | $5.49 |
| Margin of safety | 6.6% (better) | −50.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.1% | 11.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.6% (better) | 6.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 5.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 7.3% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −10.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.8% (better) | 33.8% |
| Operating margin | 25.8% (better) | 5.3% |
| Net margin | 18.4% (better) | 1.6% |
| FCF margin | 12.5% (better) | 7.8% |
| Return on equity | 36.0% (better) | 2.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 27.3% (better) | 5.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.53 (better) | 0.69 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.69 (better) | 2.33 |
| Interest coverage | 14.9× (better) | 1.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.45 | 2.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 7.08 (better) | 2.17 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | – |
| Payout ratio | 18.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 7 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.3% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 92.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.6% | 17.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $100.0K | $316K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- AWI stock overview
- AWI income statement
- AWI valuation and score
- SWIM stock overview
- SWIM income statement
- SWIM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.