Armstrong World Industries vs Core Molding Technologies
AWI and CMT side by side, both in miscellaneous plastics products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AWI and CMT compare
Armstrong World Industries is the larger company, worth 37 times as much as Core Molding Technologies ($7.4B against $196M).
On earnings, Armstrong World Industries is cheaper: it trades at 23.5× trailing earnings, against 27.4× for Core Molding Technologies.
Core Molding Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.4% versus 9.1% for Armstrong World Industries).
Armstrong World Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.4% compared with 2.4% at Core Molding Technologies.
Armstrong World Industries pays a dividend yielding 0.58%; Core Molding Technologies does not pay one.
Armstrong World Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 12 for Core Molding Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AWI | CMT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.4B | $196M |
| Share price | $175.74 | $22.17 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.8% | 16.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 56.8% | 135% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 0.62 |
| Employees | 2,500 | 1,239 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.5× (better) | 27.4× |
| P/S | 4.2× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 8.2× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.5× | 9.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 33.7× | – |
| PEG | 1.34 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.0% (better) | −9.8% |
| Fair value | $188.16 | $22.39 |
| Margin of safety | 6.6% (better) | 1.00% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.1% | 9.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.6% (better) | 4.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 5.1% (better) | −13.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 7.3% (better) | −13.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 5.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.8% (better) | 17.3% |
| Operating margin | 25.8% (better) | 2.9% |
| Net margin | 18.4% (better) | 2.4% |
| FCF margin | 12.5% (better) | −6.7% |
| Return on equity | 36.0% (better) | 4.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 27.3% (better) | 4.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.53 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.69 (better) | −0.27 |
| Interest coverage | 14.9× | 49.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.45 | 1.86 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 7.08 (better) | 4.19 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | – |
| Payout ratio | 18.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 7 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.3% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.6% (better) | 1.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.2% (better) | 1.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 72.7% |
| Held by insiders | 1.6% | 14.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $100.0K (better) | −$328K |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- AWI stock overview
- AWI income statement
- AWI valuation and score
- CMT stock overview
- CMT income statement
- CMT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.