Avnet vs Td Synnex
AVT and SNX side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AVT and SNX compare
Td Synnex is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Avnet ($19.0B against $6.9B).
On earnings, Avnet is cheaper: it trades at 12.6× trailing earnings, against 14.5× for Td Synnex.
Avnet grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.3% versus 24.1% for Td Synnex).
Td Synnex keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.8% compared with 1.7% at Avnet.
Both pay dividends: Avnet yields 1.7% and Td Synnex 0.81%.
Td Synnex scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 10 for Avnet), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AVT | SNX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.9B | $19.0B |
| Share price | $83.97 | $237.58 |
| Change, 1 year | 78.0% | 55.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 116% | 108% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.08 |
| Employees | 15K | 270K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.6× (better) | 14.5× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.3× |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 2.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.5× (better) | 9.6× |
| PEG | – | 1.06 |
| FCF yield | −15.3% | −4.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $89.90 | $246.54 |
| Margin of safety | 6.6% (better) | 3.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 44.3% (better) | 24.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.2% | 25.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 142% (better) | 71.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 150% (better) | 78.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 15.7% (better) | −0.51% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.3% (better) | 6.9% |
| Operating margin | 3.3% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net margin | 1.7% | 1.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −3.2% | −1.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.1% | 14.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.3% | 12.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.79 | 0.59 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.46 | 1.93 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.7× | 6.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.73 (better) | 1.19 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.00 (better) | 2.62 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% (better) | 0.81% |
| Payout ratio | 20.6% | 11.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.5% | 34.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% | 3.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 108% | 92.0% |
| Held by insiders | 1.7% | 0.69% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$17.2M (better) | −$41.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.0% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- AVT stock overview
- AVT income statement
- AVT valuation and score
- SNX stock overview
- SNX income statement
- SNX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.