Aviat Networks vs Ubiquiti
AVNW and UI side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AVNW and UI compare
Ubiquiti is the larger company, worth 132 times as much as Aviat Networks ($34.1B against $258M).
On earnings, Ubiquiti is cheaper: it trades at 35.6× trailing earnings, against 106× for Aviat Networks.
Ubiquiti grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.2% versus 1.2% for Aviat Networks).
Ubiquiti keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.3% compared with 0.58% at Aviat Networks.
Ubiquiti pays a dividend yielding 0.60%; Aviat Networks does not pay one.
Ubiquiti scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 8 for Aviat Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AVNW | UI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $258M | $34.1B |
| Share price | $20.17 | $563.81 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.2% | −27.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −37.5% | 82.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.96 | 1.15 |
| Employees | 900 | 1,321 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 22 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 106× | 35.6× (better) |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 10.4× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 23.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.6× (better) | 27.8× |
| P/FCF | 42.4× | 37.5× (better) |
| PEG | – | 1.08 |
| FCF yield | 2.4% | 2.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $26.62 | $554.02 |
| Margin of safety | 24.2% (better) | −1.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.2% | 27.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.8% | 11.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 89.3% (better) | 34.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 90.0% (better) | 34.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −54.2% | 10.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.5% | 46.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.4% | 36.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.58% | 29.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.4% | 27.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.96% | 91.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.3% | 120% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.36 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.07 (better) | −0.51 |
| Current ratio | 1.97 | 2.93 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.40 | 31.85 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.60% |
| Payout ratio | – | 20.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.60% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.6% | 4.9% |
| Held by insiders | 6.0% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.2M | −$542K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.3% | 0.61% |
Go deeper
- AVNW stock overview
- AVNW income statement
- AVNW valuation and score
- UI stock overview
- UI income statement
- UI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.