Avient vs Rogers
AVNT and ROG side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AVNT and ROG compare
Avient is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Rogers ($4.2B against $2.3B).
On earnings, Avient is cheaper: it trades at 23.7× trailing earnings, against 51.7× for Rogers.
Rogers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.7% versus 5.2% for Avient).
Rogers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.3% compared with 5.3% at Avient.
Avient pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Rogers does not pay one.
Avient scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 11 for Rogers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AVNT | ROG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.2B | $2.3B |
| Share price | $46.23 | $130.89 |
| Change, 1 year | 56.0% | 53.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −23.0% | −51.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.34 | 0.86 |
| Employees | 9,000 | 3,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.7× (better) | 51.7× |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 2.7× |
| P/B | 1.7× (better) | 1.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.8× (better) | 17.1× |
| P/FCF | 17.7× (better) | 24.0× |
| FCF yield | 5.6% (better) | 4.2% |
| Fair value | $54.10 | $96.27 |
| Margin of safety | 14.5% (better) | −36.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.2% | 6.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.0% (better) | 0.20% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 59.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 57.3% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −9.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.7% | 32.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 9.7% (better) | 7.9% |
| Net margin | 5.3% | 5.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.0% | 11.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.5% (better) | 3.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.4% (better) | 4.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.74 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.65 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.71 | 4.14 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.62 | 8.09 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 55.7% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.4% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 0.83% | 4.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 2.5% |
Go deeper
- AVNT stock overview
- AVNT income statement
- AVNT valuation and score
- ROG stock overview
- ROG income statement
- ROG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.