Broadcom vs Texas Instruments
AVGO and TXN side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AVGO and TXN compare
Broadcom is the larger company, worth 5.7 times as much as Texas Instruments ($1.6T against $275B).
Broadcom grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.7% versus 16.7% for Texas Instruments).
Both pay dividends: Broadcom yields 0.80% and Texas Instruments 2.4%.
Texas Instruments scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 12 for Broadcom), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AVGO | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.6T | $275B |
| Share price | $326.08 | $300.84 |
| Change, 1 year | −15.5% | 87.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 483% | 55.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.83 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 33K | 33K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 45.8× |
| P/S | 17.5× | 14.1× (better) |
| P/B | – | 15.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 37.2× (better) | 38.8× |
| P/FCF | 39.5× (better) | 51.3× |
| FCF yield | 2.5% (better) | 1.9% |
| Fair value | – | $190.34 |
| Margin of safety | – | −58.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 48.7% (better) | 16.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.7% (better) | 4.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 20.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 20.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 49.8% (better) | −1.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 68.8% (better) | 58.3% |
| Operating margin | 48.0% (better) | 37.3% |
| Net margin | – | 31.1% |
| FCF margin | 44.2% (better) | 27.5% |
| Return on equity | – | 35.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 25.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.78 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.83 (better) | 0.97 |
| Interest coverage | 13.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.50 | 4.86 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 12.15 | 12.92 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.80% | 2.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 84.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.7% (better) | 8.1% |
| Buyback yield | 0.54% (better) | 0.26% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% | 2.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.9% | 89.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.79% | 0.16% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.2B | −$119M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.1% | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- AVGO stock overview
- AVGO income statement
- AVGO valuation and score
- TXN stock overview
- TXN income statement
- TXN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.