Broadcom vs Nvidia
AVGO and NVDA side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AVGO and NVDA compare
Nvidia is the larger company, worth 3.2 times as much as Broadcom ($4.9T against $1.6T).
Nvidia grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (83.4% versus 48.7% for Broadcom).
Both pay dividends: Broadcom yields 0.80% and Nvidia 0.25%.
Nvidia scores higher on the StockData Score (26 against 12 for Broadcom), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AVGO | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.6T | $4.9T |
| Share price | $326.08 | $204.64 |
| Change, 1 year | −15.5% | −1.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 483% | 588% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.83 | 2.04 |
| Employees | 33K | 42K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 26 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 25.9× |
| P/S | 17.5× | 16.3× (better) |
| P/B | – | 21.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 37.2× | 24.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 39.5× | 38.8× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.13 |
| FCF yield | 2.5% | 2.6% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $306.55 |
| Margin of safety | – | 33.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 48.7% | 83.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.7% | 66.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 123% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 125% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 49.8% | 95.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 68.8% | 74.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 48.0% | 65.2% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 63.7% |
| FCF margin | 44.2% (better) | 41.9% |
| Return on equity | – | 117% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 114% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.15 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.83 | 0.05 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 13.7× | 427× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.50 | 4.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 12.15 | 36.93 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.80% (better) | 0.25% |
| Payout ratio | – | 3.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.7% | 20.1% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.54% | 1.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% | 1.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.9% | 69.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.79% | 3.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.2B (better) | −$1.9B |
| Superinvestors holding | 6 | 11 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.1% | 1.3% |
Go deeper
- AVGO stock overview
- AVGO income statement
- AVGO valuation and score
- NVDA stock overview
- NVDA income statement
- NVDA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.