AeroVironment vs Karman
AVAV and KRMN side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AVAV and KRMN compare
AeroVironment and Karman are about the same size, with market caps of $6.0B and $5.4B.
AeroVironment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (84.4% versus 56.3% for Karman).
Karman scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for AeroVironment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AVAV | KRMN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.0B | $5.4B |
| Share price | $117.52 | $40.66 |
| Change, 1 year | −63.7% | −40.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 32.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.53 | 1.48 |
| Employees | 3,991 | 1,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 104× |
| P/S | 3.0× (better) | 8.1× |
| P/B | – | 12.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 36.3× |
| FCF yield | −0.42% | −0.14% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $13.21 |
| Margin of safety | – | −208% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 84.4% (better) | 56.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 38.0% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 345% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 388% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 26.5% | 42.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −12.6% | 16.3% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 7.5% |
| FCF margin | −1.2% | −1.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 12.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.94 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.65 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.9× |
| Current ratio | 4.26 (better) | 3.10 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.19 | 3.59 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 61.2% | 93.8% |
| Held by insiders | 48.4% | 62.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M (better) | −$9.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 19.5% | 38.6% |
Go deeper
- AVAV stock overview
- AVAV income statement
- AVAV valuation and score
- KRMN stock overview
- KRMN income statement
- KRMN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.