StockData

Aurora Innovation vs CID Holdco

AUR and DAIC side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AUR and DAIC compare

Aurora Innovation is the larger company, worth 3308 times as much as CID Holdco ($8.7B against $2.6M).

CID Holdco keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −277% compared with −18000% at Aurora Innovation.

Aurora Innovation scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 1 for CID Holdco), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAURDAIC
Size and price
Market cap$8.7B$2.6M
Share price$4.36$1.13
Change, 1 year−14.5%−98.3%
Change, 5 years−56.4%–
Beta (5Y)2.541.67
Employees–68
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)1
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score6 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1748×0.5× (better)
P/B4.5×–
FCF yield−8.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)400%–
Profitability
Gross margin−400%42.8% (better)
Operating margin−19400%−253% (better)
Net margin−18000%−277% (better)
FCF margin−15020%–
Return on equity−45.6%–
Return on invested capital−42.7%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−11.4×
Current ratio11.38 (better)0.27
Altman Z-score20.00 (better)−19.63
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−8.4%–
Shareholder yield−8.4%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions84.9%–
Held by insiders20.0%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.2B–
Superinvestors holding3–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.