StockData

Auna vs Starling Oncology

AUNA and STLN side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AUNA and STLN compare

Starling Oncology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.4% versus −0.02% for Auna).

Auna keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.2% compared with −6.2% at Starling Oncology.

Starling Oncology scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Auna), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAUNASTLN
Size and price
Market cap–$666M
Share price$4.51$6.53
Change, 1 year−23.8%38.9%
Change, 5 years–−34.6%
Beta (5Y)0.641.60
Employees15K641
StockData Score
Total score56 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score3 (better)2
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–1.1×
FCF yield–−0.49%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−0.02%38.4% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–21.8%
Net income growth (TTM)−11.5%–
EPS growth (TTM)−19.0%–
Profitability
Gross margin37.9%–
Operating margin14.3% (better)−4.4%
Net margin2.2% (better)−6.2%
FCF margin13.1% (better)−0.56%
Return on equity6.3%–
Return on invested capital7.2% (better)−83.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity2.21–
Net debt / EBITDA3.77–
Interest coverage1.0× (better)−3.4×
Current ratio1.111.36 (better)
Altman Z-score–2.78
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions8.1%43.4%
Held by insiders49.1%56.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months$284K (better)−$122K

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.