StockData

Auna vs Concord Medical Services

AUNA and CCM side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AUNA and CCM compare

Concord Medical Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.9% versus −0.02% for Auna).

Auna keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.2% compared with −20.2% at Concord Medical Services.

Auna scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for Concord Medical Services), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAUNACCM
Size and price
Share price$4.59$3.62
Change, 1 year−12.2%−24.4%
Change, 5 years–−85.3%
Beta (5Y)0.650.32
Employees15K610
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score3 (better)1
Health score1 (better)0
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−0.02%19.9% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–15.6%
Net income growth (TTM)−11.5%–
EPS growth (TTM)−19.0%–
Profitability
Gross margin37.9% (better)5.6%
Operating margin14.3% (better)−56.8%
Net margin2.2% (better)−20.2%
FCF margin13.1% (better)−56.1%
Return on equity6.3%–
Return on invested capital7.2% (better)−19.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity2.21–
Net debt / EBITDA3.77–
Interest coverage1.0× (better)−1.7×
Current ratio1.11 (better)0.48
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions8.1%0.03%
Held by insiders49.1%0.83%
Insider net buying, 12 months$284K–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.