ATIF vs Lichen International
AUC and LICN side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AUC and LICN compare
ATIF scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Lichen International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AUC | LICN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $5.24 | $0.040 |
| Change, 1 year | −38.1% | −98.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −92.3% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.14 | – |
| Employees | 6 | 399 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 93.5% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.2% (better) | −51.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 1129% |
| Operating margin | −70.2% (better) | −2234% |
| Net margin | – | −2715% |
| FCF margin | – | −2206% |
| Return on equity | – | −35.1% |
| Return on invested capital | −3.6% (better) | −34.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 23.67 (better) | 5.81 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 3 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 22.4% | 0.00% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.08% | 0.62% |
Go deeper
- AUC stock overview
- AUC income statement
- AUC valuation and score
- LICN stock overview
- LICN income statement
- LICN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.