StockData

ATIF vs Greenpro Capital

AUC and GRNQ side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AUC and GRNQ compare

ATIF grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (93.5% versus 8.1% for Greenpro Capital).

Greenpro Capital scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for ATIF), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAUCGRNQ
Size and price
Market cap–$13.3M
Share price$5.24$7.31
Change, 1 year−38.1%−54.6%
Change, 5 years−92.3%−92.0%
Beta (5Y)−0.140.09
Employees641
StockData Score
Total score78 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score01 (better)
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–4.3×
P/B–0.7×
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)93.5% (better)8.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average13.2% (better)−1.7%
Profitability
Gross margin–52.6%
Operating margin−70.2% (better)−110%
Net margin–−116%
Return on equity–−29.3%
Return on invested capital−3.6% (better)−44.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage–−4735.7×
Current ratio23.67 (better)15.92
Altman Z-score–7.01
Piotroski F-score–2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–0.78%
Held by insiders22.4%–
Insider net buying, 12 months–$400K
Short interest, % of float0.08%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.