ATIF vs Etoiles Capital
AUC and EFTY side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AUC and EFTY compare
ATIF grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (93.5% versus 27.6% for Etoiles Capital).
ATIF scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Etoiles Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AUC | EFTY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $5.24 | $15.02 |
| Change, 1 year | −38.1% | 0.00% |
| Change, 5 years | −92.3% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.14 | 0.14 |
| Employees | 6 | 24 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 93.5% (better) | 27.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.2% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −118% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −117% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −70.2% | −0.99% (better) |
| Net margin | – | −4.8% |
| FCF margin | – | −49.6% |
| Return on equity | – | −4.6% |
| Return on invested capital | −3.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −0.6× |
| Current ratio | 23.67 (better) | 4.37 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 3 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 0.41% |
| Held by insiders | 22.4% | 51.2% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.08% | 5.2% |
Go deeper
- AUC stock overview
- AUC income statement
- AUC valuation and score
- EFTY stock overview
- EFTY income statement
- EFTY valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.