Addentax vs Intelligent Living Application
ATXG and ILAG side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATXG and ILAG compare
Addentax scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for Intelligent Living Application), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATXG | ILAG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.9M | – |
| Share price | $2.43 | $1.75 |
| Change, 1 year | −66.0% | −65.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.8% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.14 |
| Employees | 61 | 198 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/B | 0.1× | – |
| FCF yield | −9.6% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | −40.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −16.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 2.9% |
| Operating margin | – | −431% |
| Net margin | – | −431% |
| FCF margin | – | −54.6% |
| Return on equity | −6.7% (better) | −221% |
| Return on invested capital | −5.8% (better) | −174% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 (better) | 0.32 |
| Interest coverage | −45.8× (better) | −412.5× |
| Current ratio | 3.71 (better) | 1.97 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.07 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| Held by insiders | – | 69.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.1M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.67% |
Go deeper
- ATXG stock overview
- ATXG income statement
- ATXG valuation and score
- ILAG stock overview
- ILAG income statement
- ILAG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.