StockData

Atlas Trinity Tech vs UTime

ATTT and FXHO side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ATTT and FXHO compare

Atlas Trinity Tech grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (81.1% versus −21.8% for UTime).

Atlas Trinity Tech keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.7% compared with −14.2% at UTime.

Atlas Trinity Tech scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 3 for UTime), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricATTTFXHO
Size and price
Share price$2.02$5.75
Change, 1 year−17.9%−96.2%
Change, 5 years–−100.0%
Beta (5Y)0.421.55
Employees1834
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score4 (better)1
Health score3 (better)2
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)81.1% (better)−21.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−4.5%
Net income growth (TTM)102%–
EPS growth (TTM)−5.4%–
Profitability
Gross margin–1.0%
Operating margin12.6% (better)−11.1%
Net margin11.7% (better)−14.2%
FCF margin–−74.5%
Return on equity16.2% (better)−535%
Return on invested capital50.8%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.11 (better)0.48
Net debt / EBITDA−3.52–
Interest coverage74.1× (better)−3.7×
Current ratio2.36 (better)1.41
Piotroski F-score24 (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions0.72%–
Held by insiders45.9%59.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.