StockData

ATS vs Symbotic

ATS and SYM side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ATS and SYM compare

Symbotic grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.6% versus 17.4% for ATS).

ATS keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.4% compared with 0.31% at Symbotic.

Symbotic scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for ATS), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricATSSYM
Size and price
Market cap–$22.9B
Share price$18.39$37.93
Change, 1 year−32.7%−51.2%
Change, 5 years−52.3%277%
Beta (5Y)0.941.03
Employees–2,000
StockData Score
Total score410 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score26 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–759×
P/S–8.7×
P/B–32.4×
EV/EBITDA–559×
Fair value–$6.12
Margin of safety–−520%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)17.4%20.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–89.4%
Profitability
Gross margin28.6% (better)21.3%
Operating margin6.7% (better)−0.01%
Net margin2.4% (better)0.31%
FCF margin14.0%–
Return on equity4.1% (better)1.8%
Return on invested capital4.9%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.72 (better)0.00
Net debt / EBITDA5.01–
Interest coverage2.0×–
Current ratio1.64 (better)1.33
Altman Z-score–6.23
Piotroski F-score7 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−1.8%
Shareholder yield–−1.8%
Ownership
Held by institutions83.2%19.2%
Held by insiders0.00%85.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$963M
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float–20.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.