AtriCure vs Tactile Systems Technology
ATRC and TCMD side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATRC and TCMD compare
AtriCure is the larger company, worth 4.8 times as much as Tactile Systems Technology ($2.9B against $607M).
On earnings, Tactile Systems Technology is cheaper: it trades at 26.0× trailing earnings, against 189× for AtriCure.
Tactile Systems Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.4% versus 13.8% for AtriCure).
Tactile Systems Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.7% compared with 2.5% at AtriCure.
Tactile Systems Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 12 for AtriCure), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATRC | TCMD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.9B | $607M |
| Share price | $56.84 | $26.81 |
| Change, 1 year | 71.9% | 9.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −26.8% | 13.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 1.33 |
| Employees | 1,350 | 1,086 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 189× | 26.0× (better) |
| P/S | 4.9× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 5.4× | 2.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 162× | 13.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 54.6× | 20.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.8% | 4.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $8.00 | $25.21 |
| Margin of safety | −611% | −6.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.8% | 14.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.9% (better) | 12.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 31.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 33.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 76.7% | 77.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.9% | 9.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.5% | 6.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.0% (better) | 8.1% |
| Return on equity | 2.9% | 11.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.9% | 15.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.11 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −7.40 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.9× | 432× (better) |
| Current ratio | 4.33 (better) | 3.51 |
| Altman Z-score | 10.00 (better) | 8.11 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 2.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 96.7% |
| Held by insiders | 4.0% | 4.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.4M | −$2.3M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.0% | 12.9% |
Go deeper
- ATRC stock overview
- ATRC income statement
- ATRC valuation and score
- TCMD stock overview
- TCMD income statement
- TCMD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.