StockData

Atara Biotherapeutics vs Fate Therapeutics

ATRA and FATE side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ATRA and FATE compare

Fate Therapeutics is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Atara Biotherapeutics ($161M against $79.6M).

Fate Therapeutics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−33.4% versus −97.4% for Atara Biotherapeutics).

Atara Biotherapeutics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −369% compared with −2620% at Fate Therapeutics.

Atara Biotherapeutics scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Fate Therapeutics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricATRAFATE
Size and price
Market cap$79.6M$161M
Share price$7.93$1.34
Change, 1 year−36.9%19.6%
Change, 5 years−98.3%−97.6%
Beta (5Y)1.642.40
Employees14161
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)6
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S20.1× (better)33.8×
P/B–1.2×
FCF yield–−66.5%
Fair value–$1.13
Margin of safety–−18.6%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−97.4%−33.4% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−26.7%
Net income growth (TTM)−162%–
Profitability
Operating margin−344% (better)−2760%
Net margin−369% (better)−2620%
FCF margin–−2249%
Return on equity–−67.8%
Return on invested capital–−1647%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Current ratio1.724.41 (better)
Altman Z-score−154.02−9.87 (better)
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−10.8%–
Shareholder yield−10.8%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions44.5%59.9%
Held by insiders55.5%25.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months$2.0M (better)−$336K
Short interest, % of float6.6%11.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.