StockData

Atomera vs Research Frontiers

ATOM and REFR side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ATOM and REFR compare

Atomera is the larger company, worth 9.5 times as much as Research Frontiers ($117M against $12.3M).

Atomera grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (476% versus −69.7% for Research Frontiers).

Research Frontiers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −662% compared with −10429% at Atomera.

Atomera scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Research Frontiers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricATOMREFR
Size and price
Market cap$117M$12.3M
Share price$2.99$0.353
Change, 1 year19.1%−77.5%
Change, 5 years−89.4%−83.4%
Beta (5Y)1.880.35
Employees215
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)6
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score45 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S534×33.1× (better)
P/B3.6× (better)20.1×
FCF yield−12.8% (better)−15.1%
Fair value–$0.159
Margin of safety–−122%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)476% (better)−69.7%
Revenue growth, 5Y average0.95%6.2% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin−29.2%–
Operating margin−10969%−670% (better)
Net margin−10429%−662% (better)
FCF margin−6827%−500% (better)
Return on equity−88.1% (better)−233%
Return on invested capital–−1167%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage−1144.0×–
Current ratio7.35 (better)2.21
Altman Z-score1.85 (better)−90.63
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−26.7%–
Shareholder yield−26.7%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions53.5%10.5%
Held by insiders5.4%8.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.9M–
Short interest, % of float17.1%1.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.