Atomera vs POET Technologies
ATOM and POET side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATOM and POET compare
POET Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2495% versus 476% for Atomera).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATOM | POET |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $117M | – |
| Share price | $2.99 | $5.59 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.1% | 5.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −89.4% | −25.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.88 | 1.40 |
| Employees | 21 | 1 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 534× | – |
| P/B | 3.6× | – |
| FCF yield | −12.8% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 476% | 2495% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.95% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −29.2% | – |
| Operating margin | −10969% | – |
| Net margin | −10429% | – |
| FCF margin | −6827% | −3102% (better) |
| Return on equity | −88.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | −1144.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 7.35 (better) | 2.19 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.85 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −26.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −26.7% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 53.5% | 26.1% |
| Held by insiders | 5.4% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.9M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.1% | 17.4% |
Go deeper
- ATOM stock overview
- ATOM income statement
- ATOM valuation and score
- POET stock overview
- POET income statement
- POET valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.