Atmos Energy vs Brookfield Infrastructure
ATO and BIPC side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATO and BIPC compare
Atmos Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.5% versus 0.05% for Brookfield Infrastructure).
Atmos Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.5% compared with −6.6% at Brookfield Infrastructure.
Atmos Energy pays a dividend yielding 2.3%; Brookfield Infrastructure does not pay one.
Atmos Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 2 for Brookfield Infrastructure), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATO | BIPC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $29.8B | – |
| Share price | $176.30 | $39.56 |
| Change, 1 year | −0.86% | −13.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 85.8% | −3.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.37 | 0.70 |
| Employees | 5,487 | 2,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.0× | – |
| P/S | 6.1× | – |
| P/B | 2.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.2× | – |
| PEG | 2.09 | – |
| FCF yield | −6.8% | – |
| Fair value | $155.62 | – |
| Margin of safety | −13.3% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.5% (better) | 0.05% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.8% | 20.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 21.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 15.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 63.6% |
| Operating margin | 37.0% | 61.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 28.5% (better) | −6.6% |
| FCF margin | −41.1% | 0.05% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.67 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.75 | – |
| Interest coverage | 12.8× (better) | 2.0× |
| Current ratio | 0.81 (better) | 0.53 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.68 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.3% | – |
| Payout ratio | 45.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | −3.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −1.3% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.5% | 73.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.44% | 10.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$26.7K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | 11.3% |
Go deeper
- ATO stock overview
- ATO income statement
- ATO valuation and score
- BIPC stock overview
- BIPC income statement
- BIPC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.