Atmus Filtration Technologies vs Phinia
ATMU and PHIN side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATMU and PHIN compare
Atmus Filtration Technologies is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Phinia ($4.5B against $2.6B).
On earnings, Phinia is cheaper: it trades at 14.8× trailing earnings, against 20.5× for Atmus Filtration Technologies.
Atmus Filtration Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.8% versus 5.6% for Phinia).
Atmus Filtration Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with 5.2% at Phinia.
Both pay dividends: Atmus Filtration Technologies yields 0.41% and Phinia 1.6%.
Phinia scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 13 for Atmus Filtration Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATMU | PHIN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.5B | $2.6B |
| Share price | $55.34 | $73.37 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.8% | 33.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.92 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 4,500 | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.5× | 14.8× (better) |
| P/S | 2.3× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 9.0× | 1.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.7× | 7.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 21.6× | 11.6× (better) |
| PEG | 3.00 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.6% | 8.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $37.79 | $79.50 |
| Margin of safety | −46.4% | 7.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.8% (better) | 5.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 10.7% | 110% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.5% | 123% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.2% (better) | 22.1% |
| Operating margin | 17.1% (better) | 8.3% |
| Net margin | 11.3% (better) | 5.2% |
| FCF margin | 10.6% (better) | 6.3% |
| Return on equity | 52.5% (better) | 12.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 27.8% (better) | 10.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.88 | 0.72 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.78 | 1.41 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 6.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.56 (better) | 1.70 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.34 (better) | 2.15 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.41% | 1.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 22.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.91% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% | 1.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 107% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 0.88% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.6M (better) | −$4.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.3% | 10.7% |
Go deeper
- ATMU stock overview
- ATMU income statement
- ATMU valuation and score
- PHIN stock overview
- PHIN income statement
- PHIN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.