Atmus Filtration Technologies vs Dorman Products
ATMU and DORM side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATMU and DORM compare
Atmus Filtration Technologies is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Dorman Products ($4.5B against $3.9B).
On earnings, Dorman Products is cheaper: it trades at 19.7× trailing earnings, against 20.5× for Atmus Filtration Technologies.
Atmus Filtration Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.8% versus 2.2% for Dorman Products).
Atmus Filtration Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with 9.3% at Dorman Products.
Atmus Filtration Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.41%; Dorman Products does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATMU | DORM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.5B | $3.9B |
| Share price | $55.34 | $132.31 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.8% | −4.2% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 12.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.92 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 4,500 | 300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 13 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.5× | 19.7× (better) |
| P/S | 2.3× | 1.8× (better) |
| P/B | 9.0× | 2.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.7× | 12.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 21.6× | 14.5× (better) |
| PEG | 3.00 | 0.99 (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.6% | 6.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $37.79 | $111.29 |
| Margin of safety | −46.4% | −18.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.8% (better) | 2.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 14.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 10.7% (better) | −18.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.5% (better) | −16.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 15.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.2% | 41.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 17.1% (better) | 13.3% |
| Net margin | 11.3% (better) | 9.3% |
| FCF margin | 10.6% | 12.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 52.5% (better) | 13.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 27.8% (better) | 11.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.88 | 0.28 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.78 | 0.79 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 6.8× | 10.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.56 | 3.65 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.34 | 4.91 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.41% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.91% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 107% | 97.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.88% | 8.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.6M (better) | −$1.7M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.3% | 5.7% |
Go deeper
- ATMU stock overview
- ATMU income statement
- ATMU valuation and score
- DORM stock overview
- DORM income statement
- DORM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.