Alpha Technology vs 3 E Network Technology
ATGL and MASK side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATGL and MASK compare
3 E Network Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.5% versus −40.1% for Alpha Technology).
3 E Network Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.7% compared with −952% at Alpha Technology.
3 E Network Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 2 for Alpha Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATGL | MASK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $8.59 | $1.80 |
| Change, 1 year | −41.2% | −86.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | −1.46 |
| Employees | 28 | 17 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −40.1% | 48.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −126% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 49.2% (better) | 47.0% |
| Operating margin | −771% | 3.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −952% | −2.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −188% | −43.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | −185% | −2.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −2070% | 1.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | −49.9× | 1.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.33 | 4.23 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 2 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 10.5% | – |
Go deeper
- ATGL stock overview
- ATGL income statement
- ATGL valuation and score
- MASK stock overview
- MASK income statement
- MASK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.