StockData

Aterian vs Interactive Strength

ATER and TRNR side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ATER and TRNR compare

Aterian is the larger company, worth 8.3 times as much as Interactive Strength ($15.8M against $1.9M).

Interactive Strength grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (198% versus −33.0% for Aterian).

Aterian keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −49.3% compared with −159% at Interactive Strength.

Interactive Strength scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Aterian), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricATERTRNR
Size and price
Market cap$15.8M$1.9M
Share price$0.879$1.18
Change, 1 year2.9%−99.4%
Change, 5 years−98.7%–
Beta (5Y)1.521.48
Employees7472
StockData Score
Total score59 (better)
Valuation score3 (better)1
Growth score03 (better)
Performance score11
Health score14 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.5×0.1× (better)
P/B1.3×0.6× (better)
FCF yield−16.4%–
Fair value$2.11–
Margin of safety58.3%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−33.0%198% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−18.0%–
Profitability
Gross margin56.1% (better)30.1%
Operating margin−49.6% (better)−72.7%
Net margin−49.3% (better)−159%
FCF margin−7.6%–
Return on equity−91.3% (better)−337%
Return on invested capital−112%−85.0% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−16.4×–
Current ratio2.13 (better)0.21
Altman Z-score−43.30−7.40 (better)
Piotroski F-score36 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions3.8%0.72%
Held by insiders–15.5%
Short interest, % of float–2.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.