Aterian vs Helen of Troy
ATER and HELE side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATER and HELE compare
Helen of Troy is the larger company, worth 55 times as much as Aterian ($873M against $15.8M).
Helen of Troy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.32% versus −33.0% for Aterian).
Helen of Troy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −5.4% compared with −49.3% at Aterian.
Helen of Troy scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Aterian), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATER | HELE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $15.8M | $873M |
| Share price | $0.879 | $37.32 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.9% | 88.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −98.7% | −85.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.52 | 0.96 |
| Employees | 74 | 1,854 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | 1.3× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 19.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 5.9× |
| FCF yield | −16.4% | 16.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $2.11 | $45.84 |
| Margin of safety | 58.3% (better) | 18.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −33.0% | 0.32% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −18.0% | −3.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.1% (better) | 47.4% |
| Operating margin | −49.6% | 1.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −49.3% | −5.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −7.6% | 8.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −91.3% | −11.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −112% | 1.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.79 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 8.48 |
| Interest coverage | −16.4× | 0.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.13 (better) | 1.65 |
| Altman Z-score | −43.30 | 1.83 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 0.19% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.19% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.8% | 95.9% |
| Held by insiders | – | 2.6% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 9.6% |
Go deeper
- ATER stock overview
- ATER income statement
- ATER valuation and score
- HELE stock overview
- HELE income statement
- HELE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.