StockData

Aterian vs Atlas Trinity Tech

ATER and ATTT side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ATER and ATTT compare

Atlas Trinity Tech grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (81.1% versus −33.0% for Aterian).

Atlas Trinity Tech keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.7% compared with −49.3% at Aterian.

Atlas Trinity Tech scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Aterian), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricATERATTT
Size and price
Market cap$15.8M–
Share price$0.879$2.02
Change, 1 year2.9%−17.9%
Change, 5 years−98.7%–
Beta (5Y)1.520.42
Employees7418
StockData Score
Total score59 (better)
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score14 (better)
Health score13 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.5×–
P/B1.3×–
FCF yield−16.4%–
Fair value$2.11–
Margin of safety58.3%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−33.0%81.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−18.0%–
Net income growth (TTM)–102%
EPS growth (TTM)–−5.4%
Profitability
Gross margin56.1%–
Operating margin−49.6%12.6% (better)
Net margin−49.3%11.7% (better)
FCF margin−7.6%–
Return on equity−91.3%16.2% (better)
Return on invested capital−112%50.8% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.11
Net debt / EBITDA–−3.52
Interest coverage−16.4×74.1× (better)
Current ratio2.132.36 (better)
Altman Z-score−43.30–
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions3.8%0.72%
Held by insiders–45.9%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.