A10 Networks vs Silicom
ATEN and SILC side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATEN and SILC compare
A10 Networks grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.0% versus 6.6% for Silicom).
A10 Networks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.7% compared with −18.5% at Silicom.
A10 Networks pays a dividend yielding 0.84%; Silicom does not pay one.
A10 Networks scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 6 for Silicom), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATEN | SILC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.1B | – |
| Share price | $28.66 | $28.84 |
| Change, 1 year | 67.7% | 98.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 73.9% | −35.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 1.15 |
| Employees | 494 | 123 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 43.4× | – |
| P/S | 6.4× | – |
| P/B | 8.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 28.3× | – |
| FCF yield | 3.5% | – |
| Fair value | $18.04 | – |
| Margin of safety | −58.9% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.0% (better) | 6.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% (better) | −10.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −5.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −2.9% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 21.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 79.0% (better) | 30.6% |
| Operating margin | 16.9% (better) | −19.8% |
| Net margin | 14.7% (better) | −18.5% |
| FCF margin | 22.5% (better) | −5.4% |
| Return on equity | 21.8% (better) | −9.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −13.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 7.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.46 (better) | 3.06 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.37 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.84% | – |
| Payout ratio | 36.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 43.1% |
| Held by insiders | 2.4% | 6.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.2M (better) | −$3.7M |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.4% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- ATEN stock overview
- ATEN income statement
- ATEN valuation and score
- SILC stock overview
- SILC income statement
- SILC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.