A10 Networks vs Extreme Networks
ATEN and EXTR side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATEN and EXTR compare
Extreme Networks is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as A10 Networks ($3.5B against $2.1B).
On earnings, A10 Networks is cheaper: it trades at 43.4× trailing earnings, against 68.6× for Extreme Networks.
A10 Networks grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.0% versus 11.3% for Extreme Networks).
A10 Networks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.7% compared with 4.0% at Extreme Networks.
A10 Networks pays a dividend yielding 0.84%; Extreme Networks does not pay one.
A10 Networks scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 10 for Extreme Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATEN | EXTR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.1B | $3.5B |
| Share price | $28.66 | $26.75 |
| Change, 1 year | 67.7% | 46.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 73.9% | 98.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 1.33 |
| Employees | 494 | 2,894 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 43.4× (better) | 68.6× |
| P/S | 6.4× | 2.7× (better) |
| P/B | 8.9× (better) | 39.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.7× (better) | 46.5× |
| P/FCF | 28.3× | 22.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.5% | 4.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $18.04 | $14.29 |
| Margin of safety | −58.9% (better) | −87.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.0% (better) | 11.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% (better) | 4.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −5.2% | 507% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −2.9% | 457% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 21.0% | 73.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 79.0% (better) | 61.9% |
| Operating margin | 16.9% (better) | 5.7% |
| Net margin | 14.7% (better) | 4.0% |
| FCF margin | 22.5% (better) | 11.8% |
| Return on equity | 21.8% | 67.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 124% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 2.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.60 |
| Interest coverage | 7.4× (better) | 4.9× |
| Current ratio | 3.46 (better) | 1.02 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.37 (better) | 1.99 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.84% | – |
| Payout ratio | 36.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.7% | 2.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% | 2.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 98.4% |
| Held by insiders | 2.4% | 4.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.2M (better) | −$26.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.4% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- ATEN stock overview
- ATEN income statement
- ATEN valuation and score
- EXTR stock overview
- EXTR income statement
- EXTR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.