StockData

Alphatec vs Carlsmed

ATEC and CARL side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ATEC and CARL compare

Alphatec is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Carlsmed ($1.1B against $472M).

Carlsmed grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (60.4% versus 15.3% for Alphatec).

Alphatec keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −10.3% compared with −55.8% at Carlsmed.

Alphatec scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Carlsmed), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricATECCARL
Size and price
Market cap$1.1B$472M
Share price$7.06$17.30
Change, 1 year−65.9%42.0%
Change, 5 years−37.4%–
Beta (5Y)1.152.22
Employees91324
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)5
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score33
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.3× (better)6.6×
P/B–6.2×
EV/EBITDA40.0×–
P/FCF357×–
FCF yield0.28% (better)−7.4%
Fair value–$8.30
Margin of safety–−109%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)15.3%60.4% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average39.5%–
Profitability
Gross margin71.3%77.0% (better)
Operating margin−3.6% (better)−59.0%
Net margin−10.3% (better)−55.8%
FCF margin0.37% (better)−48.6%
Return on equity−1888%−43.9% (better)
Return on invested capital−5.0% (better)−953%
Financial health
Net debt / EBITDA12.06–
Interest coverage−0.7× (better)−33.3×
Current ratio2.365.79 (better)
Altman Z-score−0.495.87 (better)
Piotroski F-score66
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions72.7%20.9%
Held by insiders23.5%81.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$40.9M−$2.7M (better)
Short interest, % of float12.0%24.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.