StockData

Atlas Critical Minerals vs Atlas Lithium

ATCX and ATLX side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ATCX and ATLX compare

Atlas Lithium grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−39.1% versus −86.1% for Atlas Critical Minerals).

Atlas Critical Minerals keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −5860% compared with −34892% at Atlas Lithium.

Atlas Lithium scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 1 for Atlas Critical Minerals), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricATCXATLX
Size and price
Market cap–$46.4M
Share price$1.93$1.54
Change, 1 year–−65.4%
Change, 5 years−81.1%−75.9%
Beta (5Y)0.290.46
Employees1330
StockData Score
Total score14 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score00
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–422×
P/B–1.2×
FCF yield–−76.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−86.1%−39.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–31.6%
Profitability
Gross margin−64.3%85.1% (better)
Operating margin−5788% (better)−42681%
Net margin−5860% (better)−34892%
FCF margin−3370% (better)−32076%
Return on equity−121%−103% (better)
Return on invested capital−278% (better)−287%
Financial health
Interest coverage−114.4×−72.2× (better)
Current ratio11.68 (better)1.52
Altman Z-score–−4.35
Piotroski F-score23 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−74.6%
Shareholder yield–−74.6%
Ownership
Held by institutions1.1%9.5%
Held by insiders67.4%26.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$169K
Short interest, % of float4.0%7.9%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.