StockData

ASE Technology vs United Microelectronics

ASX and UMC side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ASX and UMC compare

ASE Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.4% versus 2.3% for United Microelectronics).

United Microelectronics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.0% compared with 6.2% at ASE Technology.

United Microelectronics scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for ASE Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricASXUMC
Size and price
Share price$39.50$16.68
Change, 1 year174%126%
Change, 5 years445%54.6%
Beta (5Y)1.350.86
Employees14K19K
StockData Score
Total score89 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score34 (better)
Health score35 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)8.4% (better)2.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average6.2% (better)6.1%
Net income growth (TTM)23.6% (better)−17.3%
EPS growth (TTM)21.5% (better)−17.0%
EPS growth, 5Y average7.2%11.8% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin17.7%29.0% (better)
Operating margin8.0%18.5% (better)
Net margin6.2%17.0% (better)
FCF margin−3.5%21.9% (better)
Return on equity12.1% (better)11.0%
Return on invested capital9.3%13.1% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.690.08 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA1.22 (better)−1.89
Interest coverage6.9×27.4× (better)
Current ratio1.262.29 (better)
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Ownership
Held by institutions3.4%1.4%
Held by insiders25.3%1.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$367M (better)−$526M

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.