StockData

Ascent Solar Technologies vs Sealsq

ASTI and LAES side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ASTI and LAES compare

Ascent Solar Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (453% versus −99.8% for Sealsq).

Ascent Solar Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2659% compared with −136776% at Sealsq.

Ascent Solar Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 3 for Sealsq), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricASTILAES
Size and price
Market cap$12.6M–
Share price$1.28$1.25
Change, 1 year−24.3%−76.6%
Beta (5Y)1.911.79
Employees18185
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)3
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S37.2×–
P/B0.9×–
FCF yield−57.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)453% (better)−99.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average2.9% (better)−71.9%
Profitability
Gross margin−49.2%34520% (better)
Operating margin−2760% (better)−159196%
Net margin−2659% (better)−136776%
FCF margin−2118% (better)−128000%
Return on equity−111%−10.2% (better)
Return on invested capital−1369%−97.4% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00 (better)
Interest coverage–−593.8×
Current ratio5.1114.43 (better)
Altman Z-score−41.64–
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions20.7%6.4%
Held by insiders4.9%0.80%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$411K (better)−$1.2M
Short interest, % of float6.2%3.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.