Astec Industries vs Douglas Dynamics
ASTE and PLOW side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ASTE and PLOW compare
Astec Industries and Douglas Dynamics are about the same size, with market caps of $890M and $866M.
On earnings, Douglas Dynamics is cheaper: it trades at 17.1× trailing earnings, against 77.3× for Astec Industries.
Douglas Dynamics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.1% versus 13.8% for Astec Industries).
Douglas Dynamics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.5% compared with 0.74% at Astec Industries.
Both pay dividends: Astec Industries yields 1.0% and Douglas Dynamics 3.1%.
Douglas Dynamics scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 8 for Astec Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ASTE | PLOW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $890M | $866M |
| Share price | $38.64 | $37.54 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.4% | 20.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −44.3% | −16.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.15 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 4,468 | 1,764 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 21 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 77.3× | 17.1× (better) |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 2.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.6× | 9.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.1× (better) | 17.6× |
| PEG | – | 2.69 |
| FCF yield | 6.2% (better) | 5.7% |
| Fair value | $33.61 | $41.81 |
| Margin of safety | −15.0% | 10.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.8% | 20.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.6% (better) | 6.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −75.8% | −20.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −76.0% | −20.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −3.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.5% | 27.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.1% | 11.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.74% | 7.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.6% | 7.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.7% | 18.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.5% | 17.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.55 | 0.21 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.98 | 0.66 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.31 (better) | 2.16 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.89 | 3.09 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | 3.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 103% | 53.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 3.4% (better) | 1.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.69% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.0% | 3.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.1% | 94.8% |
| Held by insiders | 6.2% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$59.5K (better) | −$78.7K |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- ASTE stock overview
- ASTE income statement
- ASTE valuation and score
- PLOW stock overview
- PLOW income statement
- PLOW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.