StockData

Aspen Aerogels vs SMJ International

ASPN and SMJF side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ASPN and SMJF compare

SMJ International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.6% versus −39.3% for Aspen Aerogels).

SMJ International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −5.3% compared with −60.8% at Aspen Aerogels.

Aspen Aerogels scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 2 for SMJ International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricASPNSMJF
Size and price
Market cap$463M–
Share price$5.58$1.37
Change, 1 year62.7%–
Change, 5 years−91.0%–
Beta (5Y)2.17–
Employees85437
StockData Score
Total score4 (better)2
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score3 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S2.2×–
P/B2.5×–
P/FCF23.2×–
FCF yield4.3%–
Fair value$4.64–
Margin of safety−20.2%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−39.3%3.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average22.0%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−191%
EPS growth (TTM)–−200%
Profitability
Gross margin2.4%34.6% (better)
Operating margin−59.3%−5.5% (better)
Net margin−60.8%−5.3% (better)
FCF margin9.3% (better)−19.9%
Return on equity−53.2%−7.0% (better)
Return on invested capital−83.0%−5.4% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.120.09 (better)
Current ratio2.104.64 (better)
Altman Z-score−2.72–
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions88.5%–
Held by insiders16.8%58.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$58.1M–
Short interest, % of float9.3%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.