Aspen Aerogels vs Richardson Electronics
ASPN and RELL side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ASPN and RELL compare
Aspen Aerogels is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Richardson Electronics ($532M against $299M).
Richardson Electronics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.9% versus −39.3% for Aspen Aerogels).
Richardson Electronics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.6% compared with −60.8% at Aspen Aerogels.
Richardson Electronics pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Aspen Aerogels does not pay one.
Richardson Electronics scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 4 for Aspen Aerogels), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ASPN | RELL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $532M | $299M |
| Share price | $6.41 | $20.12 |
| Change, 1 year | 74.7% | 89.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −89.7% | 73.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.19 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 854 | 429 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 30.5× |
| P/S | 2.5× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/B | 2.9× | 1.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 18.3× |
| P/FCF | 26.7× (better) | 1405× |
| FCF yield | 3.7% (better) | 0.07% |
| Fair value | $4.67 | $14.13 |
| Margin of safety | −37.4% (better) | −42.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −39.3% | 13.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.0% (better) | 5.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 4748% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 6500% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 2.4% | 32.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −59.3% | 4.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −60.8% | 3.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.3% (better) | 0.09% |
| Return on equity | −53.2% | 5.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −83.0% | 6.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.12 (better) | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.10 | 4.65 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −2.52 | 6.89 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 40.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | −1.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.17% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.5% | 67.5% |
| Held by insiders | 16.8% | 29.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$58.1M | −$4.0M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.3% | 8.3% |
Go deeper
- ASPN stock overview
- ASPN income statement
- ASPN valuation and score
- RELL stock overview
- RELL income statement
- RELL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.