Academy Sports & Outdoors vs Sportsman's Warehouse
ASO and SPWH side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ASO and SPWH compare
Academy Sports & Outdoors is the larger company, worth 88 times as much as Sportsman's Warehouse ($3.6B against $41.5M).
Academy Sports & Outdoors grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.7% versus 0.84% for Sportsman's Warehouse).
Academy Sports & Outdoors keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.4% compared with −3.9% at Sportsman's Warehouse.
Academy Sports & Outdoors pays a dividend yielding 0.98%; Sportsman's Warehouse does not pay one.
Academy Sports & Outdoors scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 6 for Sportsman's Warehouse), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ASO | SPWH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.6B | $41.5M |
| Share price | $59.20 | $1.06 |
| Change, 1 year | 21.2% | −59.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 28.8% | −93.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 0.46 |
| Employees | 23K | 5,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.9× | – |
| P/S | 0.6× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 1.7× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.4× (better) | 30.1× |
| P/FCF | 11.0× | 1.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 9.1% | 76.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $82.21 | $6.60 |
| Margin of safety | 28.0% | 83.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.7% (better) | 0.84% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.2% (better) | −3.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 6.7% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.8% (better) | 30.9% |
| Operating margin | 9.6% (better) | −2.8% |
| Net margin | 6.4% (better) | −3.9% |
| FCF margin | 5.4% (better) | 2.6% |
| Return on equity | 18.6% (better) | −25.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 20.0% (better) | −11.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.23 (better) | 0.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.27 (better) | 15.12 |
| Interest coverage | – | −2.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.74 (better) | 1.17 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.82 (better) | 1.57 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.98% | – |
| Payout ratio | 9.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Buyback yield | 7.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 8.7% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 119% | 55.1% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 8.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.0M | $0 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.3% | 0.98% |
Go deeper
- ASO stock overview
- ASO income statement
- ASO valuation and score
- SPWH stock overview
- SPWH income statement
- SPWH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.