Ategrity Specialty Insurance vs Porch
ASIC and PRCH side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ASIC and PRCH compare
Porch is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Ategrity Specialty Insurance ($2.9B against $1.2B).
On earnings, Ategrity Specialty Insurance is cheaper: it trades at 12.3× trailing earnings, against 443× for Porch.
Ategrity Specialty Insurance grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.8% versus 15.6% for Porch).
Ategrity Specialty Insurance keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.8% compared with 1.8% at Porch.
Porch scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for Ategrity Specialty Insurance), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ASIC | PRCH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $2.9B |
| Share price | $24.35 | $22.14 |
| Change, 1 year | 36.9% | 110% |
| Change, 5 years | 243400% | −9.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 2.19 |
| Employees | 203 | 803 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.3× (better) | 443× |
| P/S | 2.2× (better) | 5.5× |
| P/B | 1.8× (better) | 389× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 44.6× |
| P/FCF | 5.7× (better) | 25.8× |
| FCF yield | 17.6% (better) | 3.9% |
| Fair value | $21.42 | – |
| Margin of safety | −13.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 29.8% (better) | 15.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 46.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 40.5% (better) | −68.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 23.8% (better) | −81.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 72.1% |
| Operating margin | – | 8.0% |
| Net margin | 18.8% (better) | 1.8% |
| FCF margin | 39.1% (better) | 21.5% |
| Return on equity | 15.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | – | 12.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 53.60 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.47 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.7× |
| Current ratio | – | 1.46 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.16 | 1.90 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 0.09% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.09% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 11.4% | 65.8% |
| Held by insiders | 81.4% | 20.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $74.3K (better) | −$43.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 16.5% |
Go deeper
- ASIC stock overview
- ASIC income statement
- ASIC valuation and score
- PRCH stock overview
- PRCH income statement
- PRCH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.