Ategrity Specialty Insurance vs Palomar
ASIC and PLMR side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ASIC and PLMR compare
Palomar is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as Ategrity Specialty Insurance ($4.2B against $1.2B).
On earnings, Ategrity Specialty Insurance is cheaper: it trades at 12.3× trailing earnings, against 19.8× for Palomar.
Palomar grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (58.4% versus 29.8% for Ategrity Specialty Insurance).
Ategrity Specialty Insurance keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.8% compared with 17.6% at Palomar.
Palomar pays a dividend yielding 0.28%; Ategrity Specialty Insurance does not pay one.
Palomar scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 3 for Ategrity Specialty Insurance), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ASIC | PLMR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $4.2B |
| Share price | $24.39 | $158.31 |
| Change, 1 year | 36.1% | 19.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 243800% | 89.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 0.67 |
| Employees | 203 | 439 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.3× (better) | 19.8× |
| P/S | 2.2× (better) | 3.4× |
| P/B | 1.8× (better) | 4.2× |
| P/FCF | 5.7× (better) | 9.2× |
| PEG | – | 0.38 |
| FCF yield | 17.6% (better) | 10.8% |
| Fair value | $21.58 | $123.31 |
| Margin of safety | −13.0% (better) | −28.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 29.8% | 58.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 39.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 40.5% (better) | 23.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 23.8% | 24.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 97.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 18.8% (better) | 17.6% |
| FCF margin | 39.1% (better) | 36.6% |
| Return on equity | 15.8% | 23.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 1.16 | 1.25 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.28% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 1.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 11.4% | 92.6% |
| Held by insiders | 81.4% | 2.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $74.3K (better) | −$21.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 2.4% |
Go deeper
- ASIC stock overview
- ASIC income statement
- ASIC valuation and score
- PLMR stock overview
- PLMR income statement
- PLMR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.