Ategrity Specialty Insurance vs Bowhead Specialty
ASIC and BOW side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ASIC and BOW compare
Ategrity Specialty Insurance and Bowhead Specialty are about the same size, with market caps of $1.2B and $1.1B.
On earnings, Ategrity Specialty Insurance is cheaper: it trades at 12.3× trailing earnings, against 18.5× for Bowhead Specialty.
Ategrity Specialty Insurance grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.8% versus 25.0% for Bowhead Specialty).
Ategrity Specialty Insurance keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.8% compared with 10.1% at Bowhead Specialty.
Bowhead Specialty scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for Ategrity Specialty Insurance), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ASIC | BOW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Share price | $24.35 | $34.16 |
| Change, 1 year | 36.9% | 28.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 243400% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 0.33 |
| Employees | 203 | 296 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.3× (better) | 18.5× |
| P/S | 2.2× | 1.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.8× (better) | 2.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 11.1× |
| P/FCF | 5.7× | 3.4× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.37 |
| FCF yield | 17.6% | 29.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $21.42 | $26.27 |
| Margin of safety | −13.7% (better) | −30.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 29.8% (better) | 25.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 40.5% (better) | 25.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 23.8% | 26.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 18.8% (better) | 10.1% |
| FCF margin | 39.1% | 53.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 15.8% (better) | 14.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 1.16 (better) | 0.61 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 11.4% | 92.7% |
| Held by insiders | 81.4% | 76.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $74.3K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 19.6% |
Go deeper
- ASIC stock overview
- ASIC income statement
- ASIC valuation and score
- BOW stock overview
- BOW income statement
- BOW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.