Asana vs PagerDuty
ASAN and PD side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ASAN and PD compare
Asana is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as PagerDuty ($2.2B against $1.2B).
Asana grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.5% versus 2.3% for PagerDuty).
PagerDuty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 37.2% compared with −18.6% at Asana.
PagerDuty scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Asana), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ASAN | PD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Share price | $9.81 | $15.68 |
| Change, 1 year | −27.5% | −0.19% |
| Change, 5 years | −92.8% | −59.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.12 | 1.66 |
| Employees | 1,767 | 1,155 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 7.8× |
| P/S | 2.7× | 2.5× (better) |
| P/B | 21.5× | 5.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 17.3× |
| P/FCF | 18.1× | 9.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.5% | 10.3% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $14.41 |
| Margin of safety | – | −8.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.5% (better) | 2.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.4% (better) | 18.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 87.6% (better) | 84.8% |
| Operating margin | −19.4% | 6.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −18.6% | 37.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 15.0% | 25.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −93.8% | 89.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.36 | – |
| Interest coverage | −56.2× | 3.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.92 | 2.02 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −1.75 | 1.44 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 8.3% | 16.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 8.3% | 16.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 46.5% | 92.9% |
| Held by insiders | 67.0% | 9.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$26.5M | −$13.9M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 24.4% | 10.5% |
Go deeper
- ASAN stock overview
- ASAN income statement
- ASAN valuation and score
- PD stock overview
- PD income statement
- PD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.